Wednesday, April 28, 2010

EU's BIOFUEL NORMS FLAWED, PENALIZES PALM OIL



Which is which now? Again wrong ASSUMPTIONS by the European Union's on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. They practice double standard to favour them? It is ridiculous for EU to keep criticizing on palm oil for contributing to environmental degradation. EU dares to use the old data provided by their own scientific & technical research arm & assume?



Written by Shie-Lynn Lim of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

KUALA LUMPUR (Dow Jones)--Flawed empirical calculations and wrong assumptions on greenhouse gas emissions make the European Union's renewable energy policy biased against non-European biofuel producers, including those of palm-based biodiesel, according to Gernot Pehnelt, director of independent research and consulting institute GlobEcon in Germany.

According to an E.U. directive, biofuels must result in greenhouse gas emissions reductions of at least 35% compared with fossil fuels in 2009 and rising over time to 50% by 2017, creating a market for at least 23 million metric tons of biofuels annually.

Under the proposed renewable energy directive, biofuel producers in the E.U. are able to claim higher greenhouse gas emissions savings than biofuel producers outside the region, said Pehnelt.

"It is particularly problematic since any reasonable emissions budgeting comparison showed palm-derived biofuel is less carbon-intensive than those produced elsewhere, including Europe," said Pehnelt, who is also affiliated with the European Centre for International Political Economy.

"The E.U. has embedded protectionist measures into the directive at the behest of anti-development environmentalists and the uncompetitive European biofuels industry. These measures set unfair values on greenhouse gas savings for foreign biofuels, thus precluding market access," he said.

Most life-cycle analysis carried out by researchers estimated greenhouse gas emissions savings of 55% for palm-oil based biodiesel, but the E.U.'s calculation, done by its scientific and technical research arm the Joint Research Centre, showed the use of palm-oil based biodiesel failed the 35% requirement, as it achieved only a 19% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.

The life-cycle assessments carried out on palm oil showed a wide variance in greenhouse gas emissions savings as data used by the JRC were based on old data.

The proposed directive, which will come into effect at the end of the year, also requires that sustainable biofuels should be produced with "no damage to sensitive or important ecosystems."

As palm oil is widely criticized by environmental groups and blamed for contributing to environmental degradation in Malaysia and Indonesia, some buyers may prefer to source other oils that are less controversial, palm-based biodiesel producers fear.

Europe's push for the use of renewable fuels in the transport sector has created one of the world's largest biofuel markets, with demand from the region estimated around 10 billion liters (3.5 million tons) in 2009.

Though palm oil-based biodiesel exports from Malaysia rose 20% or around 45,000 tons to 227,457 tons in 2009, that figure is abysmally low compared with the increase in general demand, as requirements under the directive are limiting palm-based biodiesel's access to the European market.

"The commission is committed to reducing Europe's carbon emissions. It is clear that the E.U. can't meet its own biofuel needs, so there is room for imports (of biodiesel). We are not against imports (of biodiesel), but the commission wants to ensure this is good for the environment and for trade as well," Marlene Holzner, spokeswoman for Energy Commissioner Gunther Oettinger, told Dow Jones Newswires, in response to this article.

But there is a ray of hope after a recent study showed the E.U. recently started referring to oil palm plantations as "continuously forested areas," a move industry experts consider positive for palm-oil based biodiesel in Europe.

A recent study by the International Food Policy Institute, commissioned by the Directorate General for Trade, under the European Commission, found palm oil to be the most efficient feedstock for biodiesel, as it produces byproducts and has an oil yield six times higher than comparable products such as rapeseed.

"All these studies have different results. We do not comment on the content of the studies. Once studies on the subjects are finalized, the European Commission is will issue a report by the end of 2010," Holzner said.


Tuesday, April 27, 2010

EU is BIASED AGAINST PALM OIL

EU and their unfair attitude!!! How can they act to benefit them all the way?

The EU is favouring domestic biofuel by imposing a 'default' greenhouse gas (GHG) saving level. Read the article below and do click on the link at the most bottom to see the reports from GlobEcon a German Research Institute.


EU sustainability rules 'biased' against palm oil

A European Parliament meeting today heard accusations of bias against competitive palm oil-based biodiesel from south-east Asia in the EU's contentious renewable fuels mandate.

The EU is said to favour domestic biofuel sources by imposing a 'default' greenhouse gas (GHG) saving level for foreign palm oil which falls below the 35% minimum threshold for supplying fuel towards the EU renewable targets.

The default GHG saving - which is set at 19% for palm based biodiesel - is assumed if an exporting country cannot account for methane capture on every tonne of the shipment, a condition deemed to be highly unrealistic. Domestic EU production can meanwhile fall back on higher default GHG savings for every biofuel feedstock, including palm oil.

It was asserted that the penalisation of palm-based biodiesel runs against EU attempts to ensure that the biofuels used for its renewable fuel targets have the greatest overall environmental benefits; full life-cycle analysis is said to tip the environmental balance in favour of palm oil and against other oilseed biodiesel sources such as rapeseed (used extensively in the EU), which requires more land and more carbon-intensive fertiliser per unit of energy produced.

'Protectionist' bent to EU policy

The case is made in a new paper from German research institute GlobEcon, presented today at a European Parliament hearing hosted by the Land Use and Food Policy Intergroup.

GlobEcon's Dr Gernot Pehnelt said that "the EU has embedded protectionist measures into the Directive at the behest of anti-development environmentalists and the uncompetitive European biofuels industry.

"Furthermore, the report demonstrates the rich biodiversity in oil palm plantations, the excellent crown cover oil palms provide and the yield per hectare advantages of this low-energy, low-fertilizer crop."

Pehnelt acknowledged that palm oil plantations do incur biodiversity loss when prime forest land is converted in species-rich countries such as Malaysia and Indonesia, but reiterated the small share of biodiesel demand (even in light of the EU mandate) in overall palm oil expansion, and asserted that all economic activity has an environmental cost.

Environmental threat 'bigger than for other agrifuels'

While sceptical of the overall benefits of biofuels, environmental groups have taken a particularly tough line on palm oil - and have been keen to ensure that European biofuel demand does not exacerbate existing environmental problems related to the crop.

Ariel Brunner, Senior EU Agriculture Policy Officer at Birdlife International, told Agra Europe that while palm oil is a highly competitive biofuel with low land use requirements, current production patterns in south-east Asia raise a host of specific environmental problems and should put the feedstock (along with others) out of bounds for the EU's renewable fuels mandate.

Current sustainability criteria put certain environmentally sensitive areas such as undrained peatlands and biodiverse forests off limits, but major loopholes are seen to allow recently drained areas and secondary forest-land to be used, with a huge GHG and biodiversity cost. These risks are so great that even sourcing a fifth of the new 10% renewable fuels target from palm oil would negate the environmental benefits of other biofuel use, he argued.

Brunner said that EU "artificial demand" formed by the renewable fuels mandate and tax risks adding to problems which, he acknowledged, predate and go beyond biofuel production.

He indicated that using European rapeseed-based biodiesel to meet the EU targets could end up applying the same pressure on biodiversity-rich natural areas, given that Asian palm oil production would in any case expand into new areas to substitute for the oilseed areas shifted from food to fuel in the EU.

This indirect land use change (ILUC) phenomenon is the subject of internal debate in the European Commission - and could end up being factored into the sustainability criteria for fuels used towards the targets (see AE2406, 02.04.2010, P/10).

Meanwhile palm oil has been the subject of stand-alone efforts from the food industry to clean up the environmental impact of palm oil, centering on the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification scheme (see AE2405, 26.03.2010, Analysis).

For the full GlobEcon report see:
http://www.globecon.org/en/publications/globecon-research-papers.html

Monday, April 26, 2010

ORANG UTANS ARE ALWAYS HAPPY

See it for real to believe it...they are always happy orang utans.

Recently I had a chance to follow my friend to visit Sepilok Orang Utan Sanctuary in Sandakan, Sabah. These were some of the shots taken during the visit. I am aware that various Western NGOs have been condemning about orang utan and their loss of habitat. I strongly disagree when I see this. They seem to have a great living in this forested area. In fact there were many tourists coming to this place to visit them. If you see the picture below the 'Shy Orang Utan' showing his back to us while having his good food. They have a dedicated feeding time like we have daily :-). I would say these orang utans are quite pampered when everything is taken care for them! They are just happy!






























Not only Sepilok Orang Utan Centre, there are many others in Malaysia that have been established since long time ago to take good care of these orang utans. It is sometimes very sad when we here have done our best to preserve the forest, to take care of our habitats yet some CRUEL westerners throwing baseless attacks on us! They should look into their country and how much more preserved forest they have before even talking about others! It's just my piece of comment!